|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUERY : My wife and I are partners in a partnership firm. The partnership firm owns a piece of land, which we want to transfer in our joint name. Would it be sufficient if we transfer the land by showing it as a drawing in the books of accounts of the firm to avoid payment of stamp duty, as we are the only partners in the firm. |
NAVNEET PURI, NEW
DELHI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPLY :
Although the partners have a right on the assets of the partnership firm but Indian
Registration Act, 1908, provides that transfer of immovable property with more than
the specified value shall be registered and stamp duty be paid on it. Where a firm
owns certain property, a registered document will be necessary to transfer firm’s
interest in such properties in favour of the partners. Mere book entries would not
be sufficient to effect such transfer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUERY : My brother is working on project with a University of Portugal since September 2001. The university would pay a remuneration of US $ 5,000 on completion of project. Please clarify whether there is any tax concession available in India and what is the procedure for claiming the concession? |
MUKESH K. RATHOR,
DELHI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPLY :
The repatriation of sale proceeds of any immovable property was not allowed except
with prior permission of RBI till July 2, 2002. But from this date onwards NRIs/PIOs
(Persons of Indian origin) can repatriate the sale proceeds lying in their Non-Resident
Ordinary Rupee Account (NRO) up to USD 1,00,000 per year outside India without any
permission of RBI provided the property has been held by them at least for 10 years
and all applicable taxes have been paid.~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUERY : On the occasion of my niece’s marriage I want to gift Rs. 50,000. Please clarify the procedures to be adopted by me so that no tax liability arises in future. |
Ritu Raj Gupta, New Delhi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPLY :
You may proceed to give gift of the desired amount without getting bogged down by
the tax implication, as there is no gift tax. However in order to keep the transaction
transparent and explainable in future, it is advisable to reduce the transaction
into writing by way of a gift deed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUERY : In the recent budget the Finance Minister had talked about giving sops to NRIs. I am a NRI having some inherited property in India, which I want to sell. Kindly guide me whether any post budget guidelines have come regarding the repatriation facility of the sale proceeds outside India. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPLY :
The repatriation of sale proceeds of any immovable property was not allowed except
with prior permission of RBI till July 2, 2002. But from this date onwards NRIs/PIOs
(Persons of Indian origin) can repatriate the sale proceeds lying in their Non-Resident
Ordinary Rupee Account (NRO) up to USD 1,00,000 per year outside India without any
permission of RBI provided the property has been held by them at least for 10 years
and all applicable taxes have been paid.
Further enhancing the facilities, they can also repatriate USD 1,00,000 to meet
medical expenses of them or their family members and USD 30,000 per year to meet
education expenses of their children.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUERY : I am a non-resident Indian staying in U.K., I want to purchase residential house in India. Do I need to obtain the approval of Reserve Bank of India? Is there any provision through which I can take a loan from any authority for purchasing the house property? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPLY :
NRI
who is a citizen of India can acquire any immovable property other than agricultural/
plantation/ farmhouse without any prior approval of Reserve Bank of India.
A NRI can take a housing loan from an authorised dealer or housing finance
institute for acquisition of a residential accommodation provided the quantum of
loan and the period of re-payment is at par with those applicable to housing finance
provided to a person in India. Also the loan shall not be credited to NRE, FCNR,
and NRNR account of the borrower. The loan has to be fully secured with mortgage
of property proposed to be acquired. The instalment an interest shall be paid by
remittances from outside India through normal banking channels or out of funds in
NRE, FCNR, NRNR, and NRO, NRSR account in India or out of any rental income received
from the property acquired by
utilisation of loan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUERY : I am a public sector employee and would be retiring by the end of this month. Can I invest only a part of my retirement benefits in Deposit Scheme for retiring employees of public sector companies? What is the duration of deposit? |
K.S. LAMBA, PATIALA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPLY :
There is no bar on depositing part of the retirement benefits in the Deposit Scheme
specially designed for the retiring employees. But make it sure that whatever amount
you are planning to deposit, must be deposited within three months of the retirement
for a lock-in-period of three years. In case of premature withdrawal the rate of
return drastically falls to 4% p.a. from 8.5%p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUERY : I am a retired Doctor. For past six months I am associated with a private Hospital as Visiting Doctor. I receive honorarium for my services, which are of casual and non-permanent in nature. Towards close of this financial year, the accounts department of the hospital asked me to furnish details of investments made by me for claiming tax rebate under section 88. Failing which I was told that TDS would be deducted as is applicable to other employees. Are they correct in treating me an employee as far as the tax maters are concerned? |
A.B.C, New
Delhi. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPLY :
Existence of employer-employee nexus is must for treating any one as an employee.
Ahmedabad High Court has also held that honorarium payable to a Doctor is not governed
by conditions of service of the doctor. Therefore it cannot be treated as salary
and question of tax deduction as an employee doesn’t arise. Payments to you can
at the most be treated as a professional fee and TDS @ 5% plus surcharge, as applicable
in the case of professionals may be deducted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUERY : My father died without leaving any will. The assets left by my father include four shops, a three-storied house, some shares and bank balances. My mother wants to distribute these assets amongst us i.e. three brothers and two sisters (both married). On the suggestion of my mother and with the concurrence of all of us, it has been mutually agreed to transfer two shops to my elder brother, one shop each to my younger brother and me. One floor each in the house is to be transferred to my brothers and me. Married sisters are to be given cash and a share of ancestral jewelry. Can we enter into family settlement to distribute the assets of the family in unequal parts without attracting capital gains? |
P. K. Aggarwal, New Delhi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPLY :
Most important aspect of attracting capital gains is transfer of assets. There can
be no capital gain without transfer. It has been held by courts that the family
settlements do not result in transfer.
A family arrangement is realignment of interest, arrived at in order to avoid continuous
friction and to maintain peace among the family members. It is an arrangement between
the members of the same family intended to be generally and reasonably for the benefit
of the family, either by the comprising the doubtful or disputed rights. It preserves
the family property, peace, honour and security of the family by avoiding litigation.
So family arrangements are governed by the principal, which are not applicable to
the dealings between strangers. Family arrangements are for the interest of the
family and for the harmonious way of living. Such realignment of interest by way
of effecting a family arrangement among the family members would not amount to transfer.
Intention is paramount to agreement. Supreme Court held that essentials of a genuine
family settlements would be:
- That the family settlement
must be a bona fide one so as to resolve family disputes and rival claims by a fair
and equitable division or allotment of properties between the various members of
the family.
- The said settlement must
be voluntary and should not be induced by fraud, coercion or undue influence.
If, the intention is not to circumvent the
law or to deceive any body, the family settlements would be out of the purview of
taxation, even if the shares of the beneficiaries are unequal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUERY : I am engaged in the manufacturing process. Last year one of the machinery was partly damaged due to fire. About Rs. 35000 were incurred by me to get the machine repaired. I lodged a claim with the insurance company and this year I received Rs. 41,000 from the insurance company. Do I have to treat Rs. 6000, received in excess of actual expenditure, as income in the current year? |
Kaushik Tripathi, Haryana
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPLY :
In CIT Vs. Sirpur Paper Mills Ltd., the Supreme Court has held that in the case
of damaged machinery, excess of insurance claim received over the expenditure incurred
on repair shall be treated as capital receipt. This receipt would be out of tax
net. Thus excess i.e. Rs. 6,000 shall be regarded as capital receipt and it shall
not liable to income tax.
Please note that in case the machinery is damaged beyond
repairs, the compensation received from the insurance company shall be liable to
capital gain tax.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUERY : My father wants to gift a house to my wife and me. Is it necessary to formalise the gift by way of documents and registration? Please clarify. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPLY :
According to Transfer of Property Act, gift of immovable
property must be registered. Gift is transfer of existing movable or immovable property
made voluntarily and without consideration, by one person to another. Though there
is no bar on oral transfers but in case of immovable properties transfer has to
be effected by way of registered instrument signed by or on behalf of the donor,
and attested by at least two witnesses. (Supreme Court of India in CIT v Sirehmal
Nawalakha)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUERY : I am running a business in proprietorship. If, I introduce my wife as partner in the same business, her income would be clubbed with my income, as she does not have any professional or technical qualification. Similarly, if I pay her salary as an employee again her income would be clubbed with my income for the same reasons. But in the second situation where she is acting as my employee, she can claim standard deduction, medical reimbursement and other tax-free perquisites thereby reducing over all tax liability. Do you agree with my scheme? |
Neeraj K. Goel, New
Delhi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPLY :
The scheme is valid and you may choose the second option to reduce your tax liability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUERY : I sold a house in the last year and made some capital gains. I am a senior citizen without taxable income and do not file my returns. Now I have to file my return for the purpose of declaring capital gains earned on sale of house. I have not deposited any tax till date. Do I have to pay interest on non payment of advance tax or the capital gains are exempt from payment of advance tax? |
D.K. VERMA , NEW DELHI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPLY :
Advance tax is payable on all types of income, including capital gains. Advance
tax is based on the estimated income for the year and it has to be paid in installments
prescribed in the Act. Interest is charged in case of non-payment or late payment.
However in the case of capital gains, it is not possible to estimate the gains for
the year in advance. The liability of payment of advance tax on account of capital
gains arises only after the gain has crystallised. The total taxable income is re-estimated
including thereby the capital gains and remaining installments due are recomputed.
Interest if any has to be charged accordingly.
Since you have not paid any tax before 31st March you are liable to pay interest
on the tax on two account. Firstly on account of non-payment of advance tax and
secondly on account of deferment of advance tax.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUERY : Popular game shows on TV channels and Websites dole out lots of gifts, free tours, prizes and cash awards. Though I have not been able to participate in any one of them, however I am keen to know about their taxability. Please clarify the law relating to the tax deduction in case of prizes won in kind. |
MOHINDER RUSTAGI,
MUZAFFARNAGER
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPLY :
Free gifts, prizes and cash awards won under game shows, entertainment programmes
on television or on electronic mode; winnings from lotteries by draw of lots or
by chance; incomes from crossword puzzles, races or card games and any other income
from any other games of any sort or from gambling or betting of any form or nature
whatsoever are taxable incomes.
The Organiser of the show or the game is
supposed to deduct tax at source @30% ,
before handing over the prize.
There is no distinction between prizes won in cash or prize in kind.
Both are subject
to tax as ‘Income From Other Sources’. Since, casual incomes are exempt up to first Rs.5000 ( Rs. 2500 in case of horse races), the Organiser has to deduct the tax
after providing this deduction.
In case of prize-in-kind, the Organiser responsible for handing over the prize may
ask the winner to deposit the tax before releasing the prize.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUERY : Our family members are carrying on business through a partnership firm where all the members of the family are partners. The business is being carried out in a premises owned by family HUF. No rent is being paid to the HUF from the firm for use of the premises. The assessing officer has made additions in the hands of HUF on account of notional rent. Is it correct? |
Ganesh Prasad, Rohtak |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPLY :
‘Income from house property’ is the only head of income in Income-Tax where notional
income may be charged to tax even if no rent is received.
An exception is made in
a case where the premises is used for carrying on business of the owner of the property,
and the profits of such business are otherwise taxable.
HUF is the owner of the property but the business is carried by the firm. Under
the Indian income tax the HUF and the partnership firm are legally separate entities
and are separately taxable. Therefore the HUF is liable to tax on the basis of fair
market value of the property owned without any advantage to firm for unpaid rent.
In fact profits of the firm stand higher in absence any payment on account of rent.
Thus it is advisable to pay rent from the firm to HUF to reduce overall tax liability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUERY : I have been contributing Rs. 6000 per year under LIC’s 10year Dhanaraksha Scheme since 1989. The scheme has matured and I have received the redemption amount consisting of principal investment, dividend units and bonus. Clarify the taxability of the amount received. |
Sunil Kumar Massieh,
New Delhi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPLY :
Redemption amount on maturity of Dhanaraksha is subject to capital gains tax. Dhanaraksha
’89 was launched as open ended insurance linked tax saving scheme by L.I.C. Mutual
Funds for providing attractive returns on investments made in the shape of units.
In addition it offered life insurance cover and free accident insurance cover.
A portion of annual investment is appropriated towards life and accident insurance
premium and the balance amount is allotted as units to the investor.
Annual dividend ,declared on the units and is reinvested and investor is credited
with equivalent units at the rate prevailing for issue of new units.
On maturity the investor is entitled to:
- Units originally invested
- Units purchased from the
accrued dividend
- Bonus.
All units are redeemed at the market
price prevailing at maturity.
Taxability during the scheme:
- Annual investments made
in 10 year / 15 year plan are eligible for rebate under Section 88 on year to year
basis.
- Annual dividend declared
(and reinvested in units): Up to financial year ended March 1999, the dividends
received from units were eligible for deduction under Section 80L. With effect from
1.4.1999 the dividend income from units in the hands of investors is exempt under
section 10 (33)( iii).
Tax treatment on maturity:
- Growth in the NAV of units
on redemption is liable to capital gain tax. You are entitled to apply indexation
factor to yearly contributions to arrive at indexed cost of acquisition. Redemption
amount minus indexed cost of investment will be long term capital gain or loss.
- Bonus is taxable as income
from other sources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUERY : Every investment advisor is talking about Jeewan Bima Nivesh as best investment option. How would you rate this option as compared to PPF and NSC, the most common investment vehicles for elderly and retirees? |
Ritesh Suri, New Delhi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPLY :
Jeewan Bima Nivesh has survived
rate cut till date. It is an investment opportunity under the garb of insurance
cover. Sum assured will be paid either on maturity or on death whichever is earlier.
Guaranteed addition are paid @ Rs.85 per thousand during first five years and thereafter
@ Rs. 90 per thousand . In addition loyalty addition is paid on survival or on date
of maturity at rates to be prescribed from time to time.
It has clearly beaten PPF and NSC on many fronts including return and liquidity.
Maturity proceeds shall be exempted from tax under section 10(10D). This is the
only vehicle which offers benefits under section 88 with minimum lock-in period
of 2 years. Rate of interest with income tax benefits on five-year instrument may
go up to 14.93 %. Table shows comparative analyses of the three options.
Table
Particulars
|
PPF
|
NSC
|
Bima Nivesh
|
Insurance Cover
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
Available
|
Return
|
9.5% p.a.
|
9.72 % p.a.
|
10.09% p.a.
|
Taxability of Return
|
Tax free
|
Taxable
|
Tax free
|
Rebate under 80 L
|
N.A.
|
Yes
|
N.A.
|
Rebate under Sec.88
|
Eligible
|
Eligible
|
Eligible
|
Wealth Tax
|
Exempt
|
Exempt
|
Exempt
|
Term
|
15 years
|
6 years
|
5 years/10 years
|
Premature Encashment/ withdrawl
|
7th year onwards
|
Not permissible
|
After one year
|
Minimum
|
100 p.a.
|
100 p.a.
|
25000
|
Maximum
|
60000 p.a.
|
No limit
|
10,00,000
|
However, there is a caveat that the guaranteed return on
Bima Nivesh may also be lowered by LIC in line with other government-sponsored small
saving schemes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUERY : My son has joined a software company at USA. He wants to remit part of his earnings to me for meeting my personal expenses. What are the quantum of money that can be received and what procedure has to be followed? Also suggest me, whether such remittance would be treated as income in my hand or not? |
Ranveer Singh, Malvia
Nagar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPLY :
Last question first. The remittance sent by your son is not your income, hence question
of its taxability in your hands, on it receipt in India does not arise. The remittance
can be made by your son by way of draft or cheque in your favor or by telegraphic
transfer. There is no bar on the quantum of money he can remit provided such remittance
is not in the nature of loan or deposit. If foreign currency is received otherwise
than through authorised dealer it should be offered for sale to an authorised dealer
or a moneychanger within 7 days of receipt thereof. However he would have to follow
law prevailing in USA for such remittances. ~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUERY : I am running a small automobile repair and service station for scooters and cars. I have recently come to know that servicing & repair of cars has been made liable to Service Tax. Please clarify whether services provided by small service stations are also covered or only large one would be asked to pay the tax? |
Ritesh Rastogi, New
Delhi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPLY :
Service and repair of automobiles would be costlier by 5% if these services are
sought from Authorised Service Stations. It applies to all automobiles including
scooters and cars. However, small roadside repair shops or service stations who
have not been authorised by any of the automobile manufacturer for providing such
services are not covered by the recent amendments made in the Service Tax Act. For
the purpose of this act, Authorised Service Station means any service station or
centre, authorised by any automobile manufacturer, to carry out any service or repair
of any automobile manufactured by such manufacturer. It is interesting to note that
services provided by an authorised service centre of a particular automobile manufacturer
to any automobile manufactured by any other manufacturer would not be liable to
service tax.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUERY : People generally make deposits shortly before the close of financial year i.e. in the month of March to claim income tax rebate under section 88. However, I have deposited a sum of Rs. 60,000 in PPF Account on the very first day of April 2001 out of my past savings lying in savings account. Will I get rebate under section 88 in the current year against income of the current year, which I would earn over the year? |
Rajesh Ghai, New Delhi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPLY :
Your initiative would surly earn higher tax free income @ 9.5% in PPF Account as
against 4 % taxable interest income in the Savings Account. Rebate under section
88 is allowed if deposit is made out of the income chargeable to tax. It is immaterial
whether such taxable income pertains to the current year or preceding years. Basic
intention of the lawmakers is to promote savings by offering tax breaks. However,
if deposit is made out of the exempt income then no rebate is admissible. Also,
no rebate is allowable against long term capital gains.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUERY : My daughter, a minor has to go to USA for higher studies. Does she require ITCC (Income Tax Clearance Certificate) from Income-tax department before travelling? |
Ramesh Ahuja, New
Delhi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPLY :
Under section 230, persons travelling abroad, as an emigrant or on a work permit
or in respect of whom the Income-tax authorities consider it necessary, are required
to obtain Income Tax Clearance Certificate (ITC) from the Income tax department.
However as per board Notification No. SRO 961 dated 25.5.1953, as amended from time
to time; the applicability of this provision has been suspended in case of all person
below the age of eighteen years. Therefor in my opinion, you may not require any
ITCC in case of your minor daughter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|